• 10.24.24

    California Privacy and AI Roundup: What Passed and What Didn’t

    Last month, Governor Gavin Newsom ended the California legislative session by signing over a dozen bills on privacy and AI and vetoing several others.

  • 10.22.24

    FTC Regulation Tracker – October 2024

    The biggest news out of the FTC in October (so far) is the issuance of the long-awaited Final Rule governing negative options.

  • 10.03.24

    FCC Proposes AI Regulations

    In its latest move addressing artificial intelligence (AI), the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) to regulate robocalls made using AI.

  • 10.03.24

    Eye Exam Reminders May Violate TCPA

    Reminders about the need for an eye exam do not always fall within the health care provider exemption of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) regulations, a federal court in Florida recently held.

  • 10.03.24

    Court Finds Cellphones Covered By TCPA, But Tosses Suit

    Despite holding that cellphone users are not “categorically excluded” from the TCPA, a New York federal court granted a defendant’s motion to dismiss after determining the complaint failed to allege that the defendant was directly or vicariously liable for the calls at issue.

  • 10.03.24

    Questions About Phone’s Business Use Defeat Class Certification

    A California federal court has denied class certification where questions existed about the use of the plaintiff’s phone number for business.

  • 08.01.24

    FCC Sends Letters to Telecom Companies About AI For Political Calls

    Continuing its focus on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in robocalls, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) sent letters to nine telecommunications companies asking about the efforts they are taking to prevent fraudulent robocalls that use AI for political purposes.

  • 08.01.24

    Insufficient Allegations Doom TCPA Action

    A California federal court recently granted a defendant’s motion to dismiss the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) claim brought by a plaintiff alleging that she received a trio of unwanted phone calls, finding that she failed to state a claim under the statute.

  • 08.01.24

    TCPA Suit Tossed Where Plaintiff Not A ‘Called Party’

    A Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) plaintiff who was neither a subscriber of the telephone number nor a customary user of the number failed to state a claim under the statute, a New York federal court has ruled.

  • 07.02.24

    Who Qualifies As a ‘Senior Executive’ Under the FTC Noncompete Rule?

    With the demise of the doctrine of Chevron deference at the U.S. Supreme Court in the Loper Bright Enterprises case, the future of the Federal Trade Commission’s broad rule banning noncompete agreements nationwide is uncertain.

manatt-black

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING

pursuant to New York DR 2-101(f)

© 2024 Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP.

All rights reserved