Updated as of November 20, 2020
As the nation awaits the final formal actions necessary to certify the results of the 2020 presidential election, California is finalizing the vote count following a turnout now estimated at 80% of the state’s 22 million registered voters—the highest statewide participation in 44 years. Californians decided 12 statewide ballot measures, 53 congressional district elections and 100 state legislative races, plus numerous local bond measures and some major state and local social justice reform proposals. With nearly all of the 17.5 million votes counted, only a handful of legislative elections and state ballot measures are still too close to call.
California and the COVID-19 Economy
California will likely continue on its current cautious path regardless of the presidential election. Governor Newsom’s commitment to a “slow and stringent” approach to reopening will continue while the country awaits a game-changing antiviral treatment and widely available vaccine. The health of California state and local budgets is also in play given the continuing shortfall in tax revenues, dwindling cash reserves available to fund safety net programs, permanent business closures and record unemployment throughout the state. President-elect Biden’s likely win improves the chances that state and local governments will receive a significant infusion of direct economic aid from Washington to reduce the threat of huge deficits, safety net cuts and wholesale service reductions. However, with control of the U.S. Senate still in the balance, the prospects for substantial state aid remains uncertain. The ultimate question is whether any aid package will be enough to help California weather the COVID-19 recession and come back strong in 2021.
Political Ripples
With the vacancy created when U.S. Senator Kamala Harris becomes Vice President Harris, Governor Newsom will name a new senator, who can stand for election in their own right in 2022. The Governor’s decision is already drawing scrutiny and heavy lobbying from multiple interest groups with different priorities. Whatever choice he makes will ultimately lead to applause but also criticism from some quarters. If he selects one of the state’s current constitutional officers or a county supervisor for the U.S. Senate seat, the selection may also provide the Governor the opportunity to make one or more additional appointments to fill the resulting vacancies.
From a state governing perspective, this election demonstrates that California remains the leading state for progressive and leftward-leaning politics. Democrats will maintain and possibly add to their overall numbers in the California Legislature. While the number of seats Democrats hold may have increased, recent history makes clear that bigger majorities don’t automatically translate into lockstep unity on every policy issue or unbroken unanimity on the priorities for the allocation of scarce funding for public services. This is likely to continue the growth of internal policy divisions between the various Democrat caucuses, including those who believe climate change should be the state’s top priority to those who believe some form of universal healthcare should come first, and from those who are strong supporters of the labor movement to those who are more attuned to the emergent “gig economy.”
Ballot Propositions
California’s progressive-leaning politics are clearly reflected by the Democrats’ supermajority control of both houses of the state legislature as well as the Newsom Administration’s well-known “loyal resistance” to many Trump Administration policies. This year, however, although the progressive agenda was also reflected in the state’s 12 ballot measures, the outcome is a mix of wins and losses that suggests a 2020 California electorate that was strongly united against the re-election of Donald Trump—who will lose the state by as many as 6 million votes—but more cautious and conservative when considering the other measures and candidates on the ballot.
Among other proposals, voters were asked to decide whether to modify the 42-year-old Proposition 13 limits on taxing commercial properties, adopt nation-leading consumer privacy protections, restore affirmative action, extend the vote to 17-year-olds and paroled felons, adopt a statewide policy favoring rent control, and eliminate the cash bail system.
As of this update, what we do know is five of the 12 ballot measures have likely passed and seven appear to have failed. The biggest winner of the night appears to be the technology business-backed Proposition 22. It has the widest support margin of any proposition at this time.
✓ = Passed/Passing
X = Failed/Failing
? = Too Close to Call
Result |
What Happens Next? |
✓ Proposition 14 |
In 2004, California voters funded the California Stem Cell Research and Cures Initiative by authorizing a $3 billion bond to fund a stem cell research program. Proposition 14 authorizes an additional $5.5 billion to fund the program. |
X Proposition 15 |
One of the most controversial measures on the ballot, Proposition 15 would lift a 1978 vote limiting property tax increases in California. Proposition 15 focuses on commercial properties only, and would allow non-agricultural commercial properties worth more than $3 million to be assessed at their current market value. New assessments are projected for 2022, with full implementation expected in 2026. |
X Proposition 16 |
In 1996, Californians voted for Proposition 209 to bar affirmative action in government contracting and university admission. Proposition 16 would repeal Proposition 209. |
✓ Proposition 17 |
California’s Constitution permits parolees to vote upon completion of their parole. Proposition 17 allows parolees to vote while on parole, restoring the franchise to an estimated 50,000 people on parole. |
X Proposition 18 |
Nearly 20 other states permit 17-year-olds to vote if they will be 18 in time to vote in the general election. California voted to oppose this change to its state constitution. |
✓ Proposition 19 |
Proposition 19 is a response to the state’s record level of wildfires. It allows homeowners dispossessed due to a wildfire to transfer their property tax basis to anywhere within the state and allow tax assessments to be transferred to a more expensive home with an upward adjustment. |
X Proposition 20 |
A response to earlier ballot measures to reduce punishments for certain crimes, Proposition 20 would have increased penalties for certain property crimes and repeated parole violations, made it more difficult for some convicted felons to qualify for early parole and release from prison, and would have also required law enforcement to collect DNA samples from people convicted of certain misdemeanors, including shoplifting, forgery and illegal drug possession. |
X Proposition 21 |
Proposition 21 was an effort to adopt a statewide rent control policy and would have allowed local governments to adopt rent control far more broadly than is the case now. A similar version of this initiative failed in 2018, with 59% of Californians voting against it. |
✓ Proposition 22 |
Reviving an old-school fight between business and labor, Proposition 22 reverses a labor-backed state law that narrowed the definition of independent contractors so that most were deemed employees. Uber, Lyft and DoorDash—the biggest backers of the measure—argued that their business models are successful because of independent contractors. |
X Proposition 23 |
Proposition 23 would require dialysis clinics to have at least one physician present during all operating hours—usually six days a week—and clinics would be required to meet new standards of care. |
✓ Proposition 24 |
Proposition 24 may refine and strengthen the 2019 California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), but whether or not the measure improves on the CCPA has been a debate since before the measure qualified for the ballot. The next step is implementation by 2023. |
X Proposition 25 |
Proposition 25 was an effort to use the state referendum process to veto a law enacted in 2018 that would replace the existing cash bail system with a new points system. SB 10 was passed with supermajority support and signed by Democrat Governor Jerry Brown, but opposed by the ACLU of Northern California and the bail industry. |
back to top
Assembly Races
With all 80 seats in the Assembly up for election this year, Democrats led by Speaker Anthony Rendon started with a commanding majority of 61 Democrats, 18 Republicans and 1 Independent. This lopsided majority was already the largest margin for any party in more than 150 years, and it won’t be significantly eroded this year. The Assembly Democrats believe they will end up with a net loss of one seat (Assembly Member Christy Smith’s seat), which would change their supermajority to 60 Democrats, 19 Republicans and 1 Independent (Chad Mayes, who appears to have won).
District |
Democratic Candidate |
Republican Candidate |
Other Party |
District 1 |
Elizabeth Betancourt
|
✓ Megan Dahle (i)
|
|
District 2 |
✓ Jim Wood (i)
|
Charlotte Svolos
|
|
District 3
|
James Henson
|
✓ James Gallagher (i)
|
|
District 4 |
✓ Cecilia Aguiar-Curry (i)
|
Matthew Nelson
|
|
District 5 |
|
✓ Frank Bigelow (i)
|
|
District 6 |
Jackie Smith
|
✓ Kevin Kiley (i)
|
|
District 7 |
✓ Kevin McCarty (i)
|
|
James Just (Libertarian Party)
|
District 8 |
✓ Ken Cooley (i)
|
Cathy Cook
|
|
District 9 |
✓ Jim Cooper (i)
|
Eric Rigard
|
|
District 10 |
✓ Marc Levine (i)
Veronica Jacobi
|
|
|
District 11 |
✓ Jim Frazier (i)
|
Debra Schwab
|
|
District 12
|
Paul Akinjo
|
✓ Heath Flora (i)
|
|
District 13
|
✓ Katherine Miller
Carlos Villapudua
|
|
|
District 14 |
✓ Tim Grayson (i)
|
Janell Proctor
|
|
District 15 |
✓ Buffy Wicks (i)
|
|
Sara Brink (Independent)
|
District 16 |
✓ Rebecca Bauer-Kahan (i)
|
Joseph Rubay
|
|
District 17 |
✓ David Chiu (i)
|
|
Starchild (Libertarian Party)
|
District 18 |
✓ Rob Bonta (i)
|
Stephen Slauson
|
|
District 19 |
✓ Phil Ting (i)
|
John McDonnell
|
|
District 20 |
✓ Bill Quirk (i)
Alexis Villalobos
|
|
|
District 21 |
✓ Adam Gray (i)
|
Joel Campos
|
|
District 22 |
✓ Kevin Mullin (i)
|
Mark Gilham
|
|
District 23 |
|
✓ Jim Patterson (i)
|
|
District 24 |
✓ Marc Berman (i)
|
Peter Ohtaki
|
|
District 25 |
✓ Alex Lee
|
Bob Brunton
|
|
District 26 |
Drew Phelps
|
✓ Devon Mathis (i)
|
|
District 27 |
✓ Ash Kalra (i)
|
G. Burt Lancaster
|
|
District 28 |
✓ Evan Low (i)
|
Carlos Rafael Cruz
|
|
District 29 |
✓ Mark Stone (i)
|
Shomir Banerjee
|
|
District 30 |
✓ Robert Rivas (i)
|
Gregory Swett
|
|
District 31 |
✓ Joaquin Arambula (i)
|
Fernando Banuelos
|
|
District 32 |
✓ Rudy Salas (i)
|
Todd Cotta
|
|
District 33 |
|
Rick Herrick
✓ Thurston Smith
|
|
District 34 |
Julie Solis
|
✓ Vince Fong (i)
|
|
District 35 |
Dawn Addis
|
✓ Jordan Cunningham (i)
|
|
District 36 |
Steve Fox
|
✓ Tom Lackey (i)
|
|
District 37 |
✓ Steve Bennett
|
Charles Cole
|
|
District 38 |
|
Lucie Lapointe Volotzky
✓ Suzette Martinez Valladares
|
|
District 39 |
✓ Luz Maria Rivas (i)
|
Ricardo Benitez
|
|
District 40 |
✓ James Ramos (i)
|
Jennifer Tullius
|
|
District 41 |
✓ Chris Holden (i)
|
Robin Hvidston
|
|
District 42 |
|
Andrew Kotyuk
|
✓ Chad Mayes (i) (Independent)
|
District 43 |
✓ Laura Friedman (i)
|
Mike Graves
|
|
District 44 |
✓ Jacqui Irwin (i)
|
Denise Pedrow
|
|
District 45 |
✓ Jesse Gabriel (i)
|
Jeffi Girgenti
|
|
District 46 |
✓ Adrin Nazarian (i)
Lanira Murphy
|
|
|
District 47 |
✓ Eloise Gomez Reyes (i)
|
Matthew Gordon
|
|
District 48 |
✓ Blanca Rubio (i)
|
|
|
District 49 |
✓ Edwin Chau (i)
|
Burton Brink
|
|
District 50 |
✓ Richard Bloom (i)
Will Hess
|
|
|
District 51 |
✓ Wendy Carrillo (i)
|
|
|
District 52 |
✓ Freddie Rodriguez (i)
|
Toni Holle
|
|
District 53 |
✓ Miguel Santiago (i)
Godfrey Santos Plata
|
|
|
District 54 |
✓ Sydney Kamlager (i)
Tracy Bernard Jones
|
|
|
District 55 |
Andrew Rodriguez
|
✓ Phillip Chen (i)
|
|
District 56 |
✓ Eduardo Garcia (i)
|
America Figueroa
|
|
District 57 |
✓ Lisa Calderon
|
Jessica Martinez
|
|
District 58 |
✓ Cristina Garcia (i)
|
|
Margaret Villa (Green Party)
|
District 59 |
✓ Reginald Jones-Sawyer (i)
Efren Martinez
|
|
|
District 60 |
✓ Sabrina Cervantes (i)
|
Chris Raahauge
|
|
District 61 |
✓ Jose Medina (i)
|
Ali Mazarei
|
|
District 62 |
✓ Autumn Burke (i)
|
Robert Steele
|
|
District 63 |
✓ Anthony Rendon (i)
Maria Estrada
|
|
|
District 64 |
✓ Mike Gipson (i)
Fatima Iqbal-Zubair
|
|
|
District 65 |
✓ Sharon Quirk-Silva (i)
|
Cynthia Thacker
|
|
District 66 |
✓ Al Muratsuchi (i)
|
Arthur Schaper
|
|
District 67 |
Jerry Carlos
|
✓ Kelly Seyarto
|
|
District 68 |
Melissa Fox
|
✓ Steven S. Choi (i)
|
|
District 69 |
✓ Tom Daly (i)
|
Jon Paul White
|
|
District 70 |
✓ Patrick O'Donnell (i)
|
David Thomas
|
|
District 71 |
Liz Lavertu
|
✓ Randy Voepel (i)
|
|
District 72 |
Diedre Nguyen
|
✓ Janet Nguyen
|
|
District 73 |
Scott Rhinehart
|
✓ Laurie Davies
|
|
District 74 |
✓ Cottie Petrie-Norris (i)
|
Diane Dixon
|
|
District 75 |
Karen Schwartz
|
✓ Marie Waldron (i)
|
|
District 76 |
✓ Tasha Boerner Horvath (i)
|
Melanie Burkholder
|
|
District 77 |
✓ Brian Maienschein (i)
|
June Yang Cutter
|
|
District 78 |
Sarah Davis
✓ Christopher Ward
|
|
|
District 79 |
✓ Shirley Weber (i)
|
John Moore
|
|
District 80 |
✓ Lorena Gonzalez Fletcher (i)
|
John Vogel
|
|
back to top
Senate Races
Twenty seats in the 40-member State Senate were on the ballot this year, and Democrats under the leadership of Senate President pro Tem Toni Atkins started Election Day with an already powerful supermajority of 29 Democrats and 11 Republicans. Democrat Dave Min beat Republican incumbent Sen. John Moorlach, and Democrat Josh Newman beat Republican incumbent Sen. Ling Ling Chang. Two other possible Democratic pickups (Sen. Mike Morell’s vacancy in SD 23 and Sen. Scott Wilk’s seat in SD 21) are too close to call, but look to be out of reach for Democrats; nevertheless, the two-seat pickup for Democrats would bring the Senate supermajority to at least 30 Democrats, nine Republicans and one temporary vacancy created by the election of Democrat Holly Mitchell to the LA County Board of Supervisors. The vacancy will be filled by special election next spring, and the seat is in a heavily Democratic district.
District |
Democratic |
Republican |
Other |
District 1 |
Pamela Swartz
|
✓ Brian Dahle (i)
|
|
District 3 |
✓ Bill Dodd (i)
|
Carlos Santamaria
|
|
District 5
|
✓ Susan Talamantes Eggman
|
Jim Ridenour
|
|
District 7 |
✓ Steve Glazer (i)
|
Julie Mobley
|
|
District 9 |
✓ Nancy Skinner (i)
|
|
Jamie Dluzak (Libertarian Party)
|
District 11 |
✓ Scott Wiener (i)
Jackie Fielder
|
|
|
District 13 |
✓ Josh Becker
|
Alex Glew
|
|
District 15 |
✓ Dave Cortese
Ann Ravel
|
|
|
District 17 |
✓ John Laird
|
Vicki Nohrden
|
|
District 19 |
✓ S. Monique Limón
|
Gary Michaels
|
|
District 21
|
? Kipp Mueller
|
? Scott Wilk (i)
|
|
District 23
|
? Abigail Medina
|
? Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh
|
|
District 25 |
✓ Anthony Portantino, Jr. (i)
|
Kathleen Hazelton
|
|
District 27 |
✓ Henry Stern (i)
|
Houman Salem
|
|
District 29 |
✓ Josh Newman
|
Ling Ling Chang (i)
|
|
District 31 |
✓ Richard Roth (i)
|
Rod Taylor
|
|
District 33 |
✓ Lena Gonzalez (i)
Elizabeth Castillo
|
|
|
District 35 |
✓ Steven Bradford (i)
|
|
Anthony Perry (American Independent Party)
|
District 37 |
✓ Dave Min
|
John M. W. Moorlach (i)
|
|
District 39 |
✓ Toni Atkins (i)
|
Linda Blankenship
|
|
back to top
Congressional Races
One Orange County Democrat, Harley Rouda, has conceded, and three more—Gil Cisneros, TJ Cox and Christy Smith—are currently behind in races still too close to call. All these races are for previously Republican seats Democrats flipped in 2018. The California congressional delegation is currently 45 Democrats, seven Republicans and one vacancy. When all votes are counted, the California congressional delegation will have between eight and 11 Republicans, contributing to national Republican gains in the U.S. House of Representatives.
back to top