Groundbreaking Approvals for Medicaid and CHIP Coverage of Traditional Health Care Health Highlights October 30, 2024 Subscribe Nina V. Punukollu Manatt Health Lora Kim Manatt Health This overview is excerpted from Manatt on Health, Manatt’s subscription service that provides in-depth insights and analysis focused on the legal, policy and market developments. For more information on how to subscribe and to activate a complimentary one week trial to Manatt on Health, please reach out to Barret Jefferds. On October 16, CMS approved Section 1115 demonstration amendments in four states—Arizona, California, New Mexico, and Oregon—to authorize Medicaid and Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) coverage of traditional American Indian/Alaska Native health care practices. These approvals mark the first time these services have been covered by Medicaid and CHIP. Through this action, CMS aims to improve access to culturally appropriate care and reduce existing disparities in access, quality of care, and health outcomes. Research has shown that American Indians and Alaska Natives often have poorer health status compared to other racial or ethnic groups—they have a higher prevalence of chronic conditions (e.g., diabetes, asthma), mental health conditions, and substance use disorders (SUDs), contributing to worse health outcomes and higher mortality rates. Nearly one out of five American Indian and Alaska Native individuals has health coverage through Medicaid or CHIP. The four states’ approvals aligned with a policy framework for traditional health care practices that was released by CMS in April. As such, CMS has imposed similar, if not identical, terms across all four states: Eligibility. Individuals must be Medicaid or CHIP beneficiaries and receive these services by or through Indian Health Service (IHS) facilities, Tribal facilities, or urban Indian organizations (UIO). Providers and Facilities. Providers or practitioners delivering traditional health care practices must be employed by or contracted with IHS, Tribal, or UIO facilities. Reimbursement. CMS will provide 100 percent federal medical assistance percentage for services provided to American Indian and Alaska Natives. For services offered to non-American Indian and Alaska Native individuals, states’ expenditures will be federally matched the “at otherwise applicable state service match.” Infrastructure Funding. States may receive federal match for expenditures related to the development and implementation of traditional health care practices. Specifically, states may use these funds for technology, development of business or operational practices, workforce development, and outreach, education, and community engagement. While the four states’ approvals generally align, some states requested and received approval for state-specific customizations to better meet the needs of their Medicaid and CHIP populations. For example, California will initially cover traditional health care practices for Medicaid and CHIP enrollees with SUD treatment needs. If desired, California has the option to expand to other populations in the future. New Mexico and Oregon are the only two states to take up CMS’ option for infrastructure funding to build state and provider capacity to implement traditional health care practices. For more information on how to subscribe and to activate a complimentary one week trial to Manatt on Health, please reach out to Barret Jefferds. × Newsletters Subscription Country * United States Canada Afghanistan Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory British Virgin Islands Brunei Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Cook Islands Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Curaçao Cyprus Czech Republic Côte d’Ivoire Democratic Republic of the Congo Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands Faroe Islands Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guernsey Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Honduras Hong Kong S.A.R., China Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Isle of Man Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jersey Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Laos Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macao S.A.R., China Macedonia Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Micronesia Moldova Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island North Korea Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Palestinian Territory Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Romania Russia Rwanda Réunion Saint Barthélemy Saint Helena Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Korea South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syria Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania Thailand Timor-Leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu U.S. Virgin Islands Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States Minor Outlying Islands Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Vatican Venezuela Viet Nam Wallis and Futuna Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe Subscribe